Wednesday, October 14, 2026

BATTLE OF DOGALI 1887. THE MAP OF MASSAWA (MASSAUA) IN 1885

My booklet on the Battle of Dogali (1887) is gradually taking shape, alongside the other booklets I am preparing on the War of the Spanish Succession (WSS).

For the first time in my work on historical military cartography, I have used contemporary maps to reconstruct a detailed map of the city of Massawa (Massaua in Italian) and its various fortifications as they stood in 1885. To the best of my knowledge, no other maps of the area exist that are either as detailed or as extensive in their geographical coverage.

My next step will be to identify the landing sites and trace the occupation of the various forts and outposts, although the complete collection of maps will eventually be included in the booklet itself. I hope this work will be appreciated.

It is also interesting, particularly for my British friends, to understand how Italy's intervention in this region was, in effect, partly motivated by a desire to assist the British Empire, which was then facing serious difficulties in Sudan. In doing so, Italy acted in a spirit of European solidarity avant la lettre. Indeed, after some initial hesitation, the British themselves came to look favourably upon Italy's colonial venture in Abyssinia. 


Map of Massawa/Massaua and Environs in 1885
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE


Tuesday, October 13, 2026

RUSSIAN ARMY - 1805 MARIOULPOL HUSSAR REGIMENT

 Time has passed (just look at when I originally published this post), and techniques have improved considerably. So I decided to have another go at depicting a Russian hussar of the Mariupol Regiment in 1805. I was so pleased with the result that I am now seriously considering — unfortunately! — producing a few more paper soldiers, or perhaps even an entire unit in this style, such as a full squadron at a 1:1 scale.




The horse seemed a little too tall for a hussar's mount, so I adjusted the proportions and reduced its height.






BATTLE OF LUTZEN 1632 - THE COLOURS OF THE SACHSEN WEIMAR LEIBREGIMENT

I meant to bring a little order to these flags, which relate to one of my previous historical studies on this regiment at the Battle of Lützen in 1632.

In the centre is shown the colonel’s colour, already at that time with a white field, while around it are displayed five company colours, all bearing, in various ways, the colours of Saxony.



Colours of the Sachsen Weimar Wilhelm Leibregiment
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE

Then I realized that the flags for Companies 7, 8, 9 and 10 were missing (the regiment in fact fought at the Battle of Lützen with 10 companies, each with its own flag), so I wanted to put that right. Now all 10 flags are there.

Friday, October 9, 2026

BATTLE OF DOGALI 1887 - THE COLONIAL ARMY OF THE KINGDOM OF ITALY

After several years since I first carried out my research and prepared the material, the time has finally come to present the splendid uniforms worn by the Italian soldiers — the famous “Five Hundred” — who fell heroically at Dogali.

One has to admit that style was, and still is, something almost innate in Italians. The uniforms, with their striking contrasts of colour, the officers’ blue sash, and the blue band on the helmets of the NCOs — what a touch of style! — make these some of the most beautiful uniforms I have ever reproduced. 




a better view of each:


1887 - Private
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE







Corporal - 1887
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE




Corporal Major
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE


I also wanted to highlight the system used to indicate rank, both among the enlisted men — Corporal and Corporal Major — and among the NCOs — Sergeant and Sergeant Major.


Sergeant - 1887
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE


Sergeant Major - 1887
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE



Second Lieutenant - 1887
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE


And finally, a second lieutenant proudly holding the Italian flag of the Kingdom of Italy — the real flag! — which I then decided to place in a setting with a visual effect that I found particularly striking.

The result makes me think that, even for this largely forgotten battle, since I have already gathered a considerable amount of material, I could put together an interesting booklet, provided there is enough interest among enthusiasts.

Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIOR



Thursday, October 8, 2026

BATTLE OF DOGALI 1887: THE NEW DEFINITIVE MAPS

 

The Battle of Dogali – 26 January 1887

On 26 January 1887, a small Italian relief column under Lieutenant Colonel Tommaso De Cristoforis marched from the Massawa area towards the garrison at Saati, which had recently come under attack by the forces of Ras Alula Engida. The column numbered 548 men, drawn from several infantry companies and detachments and supported by a section of artillery or machine-gun personnel. A small body of allied Bazi-Bouzouk irregulars was also present in the area. On the maps, the Italian troops are shown in blue, their local allies in red, and Ras Alula’s Abyssinian forces in yellow. 

Near Dogali, the Italian column suddenly found itself confronted by a vastly superior Abyssinian force. Contemporary and later accounts differ over the exact Ethiopian strength, but it was many thousands strong, while De Cristoforis had barely five hundred men. Realising that retreat over open ground would expose his column to destruction, De Cristoforis occupied the rocky heights around Mehatel Hill and deployed his companies in a defensive perimeter. The scattered Italian positions shown on the maps reflect the desperate effort to hold the dominant ground and prevent the Abyssinians from closing in from several directions. 

Ras Alula’s troops repeatedly pressed against the Italian line, using their overwhelming numerical superiority to envelop the position. The Italians nevertheless held out for approximately four hours. Company after company maintained its ground while the perimeter contracted. The men fired until ammunition became critically scarce, shifting between the rocky positions and supporting one another as successive sectors came under attack. The fighting eventually became extremely close, with the defenders increasingly unable to maintain a continuous line. 


Map h 8.30
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE




Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE

The resistance of De Cristoforis’s column became one of the most celebrated last stands of the early Italian colonial period. Whatever judgement is made of the wider colonial policy that had brought them there, the conduct of the soldiers themselves was marked by remarkable discipline and determination. Isolated, heavily outnumbered and with no realistic prospect of immediate relief, they continued fighting even after the tactical situation had become hopeless. De Cristoforis remained with his men and was killed during the final fighting. 

Once the ammunition was virtually exhausted and the defensive positions had been penetrated, organised resistance collapsed. The Abyssinian warriors swept over the surviving Italian positions and the column was effectively annihilated. The official Italian loss figures generally give about 430 dead, including most of the officers, while only a relatively small number of wounded survivors escaped or were recovered afterwards. The Italian Navy’s historical account records that only one officer and 86 soldiers survived from the 548-man column. 

Thus Dogali was not simply an Italian defeat: it was the destruction of almost an entire isolated force. Roughly four out of every five men in De Cristoforis’s column were killed. Many died during the final overrunning of the position after hours of resistance, when the surviving formations had been broken up and ammunition was exhausted. This explains why contemporary Italian memory very quickly transformed Dogali into a symbol of sacrifice: the soldiers had not fled or surrendered as a formed body, but had continued to resist until their small force was overwhelmed. The Italian Presidency’s historical archive itself refers to the episode as the “massacre of Dogali.”


Map h 9.30
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE




Map h 10.30
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE

The battle was nevertheless a clear and important Abyssinian victory. Ras Alula had successfully intercepted the relief column, prevented it from reaching Saati and destroyed it before substantial Italian reinforcements could intervene. Dogali demonstrated both the fighting power of the Ethiopian forces and the vulnerability of small European columns operating inland without sufficient intelligence, security or concentration of force. Its political impact in Italy was immediate and profound, turning the name Dogali into a lasting symbol both of military disaster and of the extraordinary endurance of the men who fought and died there. 


Map final fighting
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE






Wednesday, October 7, 2026

SPANISH ARMY - REGIMENT DRAGOON GRAFTON

This dragoon regiment was raised in 1705 as the Regiment of Grafton, although contemporary documents could still occasionally refer to such formations as tercios. It belonged to the group of foreign units serving Philip V during the War of the Spanish Succession and was generally regarded as a British, or more precisely largely Irish, regiment in Spanish service.

Its manpower appears to have been recruited principally among Irish exiles who had left their homeland during or after the Nine Years’ War (1688–1697), together with Irish and British soldiers who had been captured, deserted, or otherwise passed into Bourbon service during the first campaigns of the War of the Spanish Succession. It is quite possible that a large proportion of them were Catholics and that many entered Spanish service voluntarily, although the precise circumstances of recruitment probably varied considerably from man to man.

The regiment took its name from its first colonel, who appears in Spanish sources under forms such as Grafton, Grafeton or similar variants. Modern research has identified him as Henry Crofton, his surname having apparently been transformed in Spanish documentation into Grafton. The unit was initially stationed in the Kingdom of Naples, where its formation seems to have been somewhat improvised: at first it apparently lacked sufficient horses and equipment, a circumstance not unusual for newly raised dragoon regiments.

The regiment therefore formed part of the Spanish dragoon establishment in southern Italy during the final years of Bourbon rule in Naples. When the Austrian forces conquered the Kingdom of Naples in 1707, several Spanish dragoon units were lost or captured. The Grafton regiment, however, escaped this fate. Together with the Ferrari Dragoons, it was transferred to Sicily, while other regiments, including the Viejo and Nuevo Dragoons, fell into enemy hands. Its operational trajectory can therefore be summarised as Naples – Sicily – Spain, making it one of the more interesting examples of the mobile foreign regiments employed by Philip V in the Italian and Spanish theatres.

After its period in Sicily, the regiment was transferred to the Iberian Peninsula and continued to serve in Philip V’s army during the later stages of the war. It is still recorded in the years following 1710 and survived the extensive reorganisations that followed the conflict. By about 1715, command had passed to Julián O’Callaghan, another officer of Irish origin. The regiment subsequently became associated with the name Dublin, and its later institutional history was continued by the Regimiento de Dragones de Dublín, whose foundation was traditionally traced back to 25 June 1705.





The regiment is also associated with the Battle of Villaviciosa, fought on 10 December 1710, although the precise role of the Grafton Dragoons and the fate of their original colonel require some caution. Some accounts refer to a Grafton serving in the Bourbon army at Villaviciosa and state that he was killed in action, but other evidence appears to show Henry Grafton/Crofton still connected with the regiment at a later date. For this reason, the statement that the regiment’s colonel was killed at Villaviciosa should probably be treated as provisional until the identification of the officer concerned can be established with certainty.

Overall, the Regiment of Grafton represents a particularly interesting example of the multinational character of Philip V’s forces: an essentially Irish or British exile formation, raised in Spanish service in 1705, initially employed in Naples, transferred to Sicily after the collapse of the Bourbon position there in 1707, and subsequently moved to Spain, where it survived the war and eventually developed into the later Dublin Dragoon Regiment.





This is the graphic and  text standards I have reached and that I want to use in my future booklets. (As for the text, I think I will develop it further, explaining how the reconstruction of each uniform was arrived at). However, as far as the graphics are concerned—which is what interests me most at the moment—I think the overall level is satisfactory.

I am also considering preparing some hand-painted gouache illustrations and then seeing how the final result compares.

Guidon Coronela
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE




Guidon Ordonnance
Copyright Michele SAVASTA FIORE



Tuesday, October 6, 2026

THE SPANISH ARMY 1701 - 1707: INFANTRY

It was no easy task to piece together all the scattered yet limited information concerning the Spanish Army — composed of a relatively small number of Spaniards,  Italians from the Duchy of Milan, Neapolitans, Sicilians, Swiss, Walloons and Germans — whose units fought and succeeded one another across the Italian peninsula between 1701 and 1707.

The sheer variety of uniforms is truly remarkable, as can be seen from the partial overview shown below. 



Thus we find white uniforms, off-white uniforms tending towards grey, blue, red and dark grey coats, with facings in an extraordinary variety of colours. Some combinations are virtually identical, while others appear to be unique.

I must admit that the work has been quite complex. For the moment, I have completed my research on the infantry, although I have not yet prepared all the individual regiments. The drummers are still missing, as are the flags and the officers, together with many of the grenadier uniforms that I still need to develop.

I originally thought the task would be much simpler, but I was wrong. What has impressed me most is the fact that there seems to be no single book dealing systematically with this army and this period, which I find rather remarkable.

I am therefore trying, in my own way, to fill this gap: gathering and cross-checking scattered information, contacting libraries for further material, and buying books which, more or less directly, deal with this subject.